DKS
ProfilePractice AreasProfessionalsCareersContact Us
Murphy Tractor-Trailer Case Win

Murphy Secures Dismissal of Multi-Million Dollar Suit

April 12, 2010


New Orleans, LA – Howard Murphy secured the dismissal of a multi-million dollar suit brought against a sugar mill and its insurers by several plaintiffs, including one plaintiff who was rendered a quadriplegic as a result of a vehicular collision that occurred in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, in March 2008.  The sugar mill had arranged for the driver of a tractor-trailer operated by another company to load raw sugar at the sugar mill, using equipment belonging to the sugar mill, and to transport the raw sugar to a refinery located approximately 60 miles away.  The driver loaded more raw sugar on the trailer than the statute governing weight limits on roadways allowed.  While in transit to the refinery, the tractor-trailer rear-ended several vehicles, including the vehicles operated by plaintiffs.  The sugar mill moved for summary judgment in the trial court, contending the tractor-trailer company was an independent contractor and therefore the sugar mill should have no liability for the actions of the tractor-trailer company or its driver.  After the motion was filed, the trial court authorized plaintiffs to take the depositions of representatives of both the sugar mill and the tractor-trailer company.  At the hearing on the motion, the trial court denied the motion.  Following the denial, the sugar mill and its insurers applied for a supervisory writ of certiorari to the Louisiana First Circuit Court of Appeals.  The First Circuit granted the writ, reversed the trial court and entered summary judgment in favor of the sugar mill and its insurers.  The First Circuit held that plaintiffs had failed to establish that they will be able to carry their evidentiary burden at trial to demonstrate the sugar mill's vicarious liability or that the sugar mill had a duty to prevent the overloading of the tractor-trailer.  Plaintiffs thereafter applied for a supervisory writ of certiorari to the Louisiana Supreme Court, which the Supreme Court denied.  Manchester v. Conrad, No. 2009-CW-1074 (La. App. 1st Cir.)     

About Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles
Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, L.L.P., is a premiere regional law firm concentrating on legal counseling and complex, high-stakes litigation defense. The firm is on the forefront of the industries it serves and prides itself on unwavering responsiveness to client needs. Deutsch, Kerrigan, & Stiles consists of approximately 60 attorneys practicing in the areas of Civil Litigation, Commercial Litigation and Transactions, Construction, Labor & Employment, Toxic Tort & Environmental, Marine & Energy, and Professional Liability Law from offices in New Orleans, Louisiana; Monroe, Louisiana; and Gulfport, Mississippi.

home


Best Places


trial.com
2012 (c) Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, L.L.P. | Disclaimer
Website By: Mudbug Media